COMPARISON OF A
SYNERGIZED AND NON-SYNERGIZED ADULTICIDE
Jeffrey O’Neill
Zoëcon Professional Products Division of Central Life
Sciences
22 Christina Court
Bear, DE 19701
joneill@central.com
ABSTRACT
The need to qualify new mosquito adulticides is
important to applicators in the mosquito control industry, the underlining
question, how do products without PBO compare to traditional synergized
products for mosquito control?
Applicators need to have the confidence that their choices are
efficacious and meet or exceed their current standards. Central Life Sciences introduced a new ULV
mosquito adulticide formulation in the summer of 2010, and like most new
products potential customers need to gain the knowledge the introduced
formulation, Zenivex E4, is a viable choice as an ULV mosquito
adulticides. Natrona County Public
Health, Casper, Wyoming with the assistance of Central Life
Sciences conducted a ground ULV mosquito adulticide efficacy trial comparing
Zenivex E4 and Biomist 4+4. Booth products were applied at a targeted
flow rate of six ounces per minute at a speed of 10 miles per hour. The products were applied from a 1000 foot
drive line positioned 100 feet from a 3 by 3 grid with 100 foot spacing. The drive line and grid spacing are
standardized procedures designed to evaluate the 300 foot spray swath produced
by ULV truck mounted spray equipment.
Two replications were performed for both products using Culex
quinquefasciatus as the test species.
Twenty Four hour mortality in replication 1 for Zenivex E4 was 97% and
100% for Biomist 4 + 4. Twenty Four hour Mortality in replication 2
for Zenivex E4 was 99% and 98% for Biomist 4+4. During this product comparison Zenivex E4
performed well and met the standards necessary to be considered as a viable
choice for mosquito abatement. Factors will be needed to guide comprehensive,
long-term preventive health measures” (Gubler et al.
Environmental Health Perspectives, 2001).